JAVED IQBAL WANI
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir Th. Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. , Housing & Urban Dev. Deptt. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Rattan, S/o Sh. Dina Nath – Respondent
ORDER :
CM No. 3989/2023
Mr. Ashish Sharma, learned counsel for the non-applicants/respondents submits that he does not want to file objections to the instant application and that the delay in filing the Review Petition be condoned.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the application is allowed and delay of 147 days in filing the Review Petition is condoned.
Disposed of.
RP No. 88/2023
1. In the instant Revision Petition filed under Rule 65 of the J&K High Court Rules, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules of 1999’) read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short, the ‘CPC’), the petitioners herein seek review of judgment dated 27.12.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned judgment’) passed in WP(C) No. 2456/2021 titled as, “Ram Rattan and ors. Vs. UT of J&K and ors.”.
2. Before proceeding to advert to the grounds urged in the petition for seeking review of the impugned judgment, facts reveal that the petitioners (respondents herein) while maintaining the aforesaid WP(C) No. 2456/2021 before this Court stated that they had execut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.