SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(J&K) 137

RAJNESH OSWAL
Parshotam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of J. & K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. S. Khera.
For the Respondent: Mr. Dewakar Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 27.03.2008 passed by the court of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Udhampur (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the trial court’) by virtue of which the appellant has been convicted for the commission of offences under Sections 451 and 323 RPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- for commission of offence under Section 451 RPC and imprisonment for a period of one year for commission of offence under Section 323 RPC. In default of payment of fine, the appellant has been ordered to undergo further one month’s imprisonment.

2. The appellant has assailed the judgment dated 27.03.2008 on the ground that the learned trial court has not appreciated the evidence in its right perspective and that the Investigation Officer who had conducted the investigation was not examined as a witness to explain the contradictions in the prosecution evidence and site plan of the place of occurrence was also not proved.

3. Mr. A.S. Khera, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the falsity of the prosecution case is established by the judgment itself a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top