Back
SANJAY DHAR
Nanak Singh – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commissioner (Revenue) J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has challenged order dated 17.02.2004 passed by the Financial Commissioner (Revenue)/respondent No. 1, whereby the said authority has reviewed its order dated 05.06.1997 and approved the order of respondent No. 2 dated 23.07.1992 and order of respondent No. 3 dated 13.08.1990.
2. The brief facts emanating from the pleadings of the parties are that the petitioner filed an application under Section 105 of the Land Revenue Act against the private respondents before the Collector (Assistant Commissioner Revenue) Jammu (respondent No. 3) seeking partition of land measuring 443 Kanals and 6 Marlas comprised in Khasra Nos. 974, 999, 986 and 988 situated in Village Paloura, Tehsil Jammu and for restoration of possession of the said land after its partition to the extent of respective shares of the parties.
3. As per the case of the petitioner, he along with the non applicants were recorded as co-sharers of the aforesaid land. The Collector i.e. respondent No. 3 herein dismissed the application of the petitioner vide its order dated 13.08.1990 by holding that the said application is not maintainable. It seems that the petitioner assailed the aforesaid order by way
Partition of land - Power to call for, examine and revise proceedings of Revenue Officers - In exercise of revisional jurisdiction by the Commissioner, he cannot modify or reverse orders of his subor....
Claiming ownership through adverse possession negates any previous tenancy status, as established by multiple legal principles.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the jurisdiction of the Financial Commissioner and the Commissioner in revising partition orders under the un-amended and ame....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the procedural requirements and limitations on the powers of the Divisional Commissioner and the Financial Commissioner under Section 15 of the Lan....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that land on the road should be divided amongst all the co-sharers in proportion to their share in the total land holding, as per the Haryana Land ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
