Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate,
For the Respondent:Mr. Navneet Singh, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab., Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate, Mr. Anil Saini, Advocate and Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Amarjit Kaur Khurana, Advocate and Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate, Mr. Shailender Kashyap, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.

Prayer in the present petition is for quashing the impugned order dated 11.03.2010 (Annexure P-5) passed by respondent No.1 by entertaining the Review Application filed on behalf of the private respondents against the order dated 14.06.2005 (Annexure P-3) passed by the then Financial Commissioner (Appeals-I), Punjab vide which the Revision Petition of the petitioners was dismissed. Further prayer has been made to restrain the private respondents from interfering in the possession of the petitioners under the garb of partition proceedings to get actual possession instead of symbolic possession to be incorporated in the revenue record.

2. This case has a chequered history. The facts as culled out from the submissions made by counsel for the parties are that Mehma Singh was the landowner, whose pedigree table submitted before this Court is as follows:-

3. Total land put under partition was 1018 Bighas and 5 Biswas. Out of this, land measuring 324 Bighas and 15 Biswas was under tenancy, whereas, remaining land measuring 715 bighas land was with the owner/co-sharers. An application for partition among the family members was filed with reference to land measuri