SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 708

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
PANKAJ MITHAL, C.J., MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, J.
State of J&K & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
Danish Zia Bhat & Ors. - Respondents
LPASW No. 186 of 2018
Decided On : 27-06-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: D.C. Raina; M.A. Chashoo; Sajad Ashraf.
For the Respondent: Z.A. Shah; A. Hanan.

IMPORTANT POINT
The waiting list for recruitment cannot be used to fill vacancies arising from the resignation of selected candidates, as such vacancies are treated as fresh vacancies requiring a new selection process.

Headnote:

WAIT LIST - JUNIOR ENGINEERS (CIVIL) - Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Decentralization and Recruitment Act, 2010, Rule 14(7) - The court interpreted Rule 14(7) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Decentralization and Recruitment Rules, 2010, which mandates that the waiting list is only applicable for vacancies that remain unfilled due to non-joining of selected candidates. The court concluded that vacancies arising from the resignation of appointed candidates are considered fresh vacancies, requiring a new selection process, thus influencing the decision to set aside the previous order allowing appointments from the wait list.

Fact of the Case:

The State of Jammu and Kashmir and the Jammu and Kashmir Service Selection Board appealed against a judgment allowing the operation of a wait list for Junior Engineers (Civil) for one year to fill vacancies arising from resignations of selected candidates. The petitioners were placed on a wait list after applying for positions advertised in 2014.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the learned Single Judge erred in allowing the wait list to be used for filling vacancies caused by resignations, as the relevant rules specify that such vacancies must be filled through a new selection process.

Issues: Whether the writ court was justified in directing the appointment of candidates from the wait list against vacancies arising from the resignation of selected candidates.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the waiting list is only applicable for vacancies that remain unfilled due to non-joining of selected candidates, and that vacancies arising from resignations are considered fresh vacancies that require a new selection process.

Final Decision: The judgment and order dated 3rd May 2018 was set aside, and the writ petition was dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Mithal, CJ.

1. The State of Jammu and Kashmir and the Jammu and Kashmir Service Selection Board together have preferred this LPA against the judgment and order dated 3rd May 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing SWP No. 670/2017 with the direction to the State authorities to operate the wait list of the Junior Engineers (Civil) for the period of one year so as to accord appointment to the candidates from the wait list to the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) against the vacancies falling vacant due to resignation of the candidates selected and joining.

2. The Selection Board issued an Advertisement Notification No. 02/2014, dated 30.12.2014 inviting applications for filling up large number of posts of Junior Engineers (Civil). In pursuance of the above advertisement, the petitioners-respondents applied. The selection list was notified on 29.04.2016 and the petitioners-respondents were placed in the waiting list. Subsequent to the aforesaid selection list, the selected candidates were appointed in terms of the Government Order dated 25.05.2016, but two of the selected candidates failed to join. Accordingly, in their place, two persons at serial Nos. 1 and 2 from the wait list were appointed. Later on, it transpired that some of the selected candidates who have earlier joined resigned to join as Assistant Engineers pursuance to their selection on the said post in terms of the same advertisement issued by the Selection Board. The petitioners-respondents claimed appointment on the vacancies so arising due to the resignation of the candidates joining as per the above select list.

3. It is in the above background that the petitioners-respondents filed the above writ petition seeking reliefs so as to keep the select list operational for a period of one year to enable them to join as Junior Engineers consequent upon the resignation of the selected candidates who were appointed. The above writ petition has been allowed by the impugned judgment and order.

4. A short question raised in this appeal is as to whether the writ court was justified in directing for the appointment candidates from the wait list to the post of Junior Engineers against the vacancy arising due to resignation of the selected candidates who have joined.

5. The submission is that once a selected candidate from the select wait list joins, the vacancy get exhausted. Accordingly, on his resignation, a fresh vacancy arises which has to be filled up afresh in accordance with law after due advertisement and selection process. The life of the wait list may be for a period of one year, but it remains operatable for that period, so as to allow appointments only against the post advertised which have remained unfilled due to non-joining of any candidate for some reason. It would not apply to fill up the vacancy caused due to the selected candidate joining and resigning.

6. The other side has defended the impugned judgment and order on the basis of Rule 14(7) of The Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Decentralization and Recruitment Rules, 2010 which have been framed in exercise of the powers under section 15 of The Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Decentralization and Recruitment Act, 2010. It is submitted that in addition to the select list, a wait list has to be prepared and the life of such wait list is one year. The purpose of preparation for the said wait list is to consider the candidates of the wait list against "drop out" vacancy. The "drop out" vacancy would include vacancy which arises due to the resignation of the selected candidates joining the post.

7. It would be profitable to quote sub-rule (7) of Rule 14 of the aforesaid Rules:-

    7. "The concerned Selection Committees of the Board shall also draw up a waiting list of 25% of the total number of selected candidates and forward the same, through the Board, to the requisitioning authority for consideration against drop-out vacancies. The waiting list shall remain in force for a period of one year fro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top