IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, J
Shahid Maqbool Bhat – Appellant
Versus
Ut Of J&k – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1) Through the medium of present petition, the petitioner has challenged detention order bearing No.46/DMP/PSA/23, dated 04.08.2023, passed by District Magistrate, Pulwama- respondent No.2, whereby Shahid Maqbool Bhat @ Shahid Tiger (“the detenue”), has been placed under preventive detention with a view to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State. The order is, purportedly, passed by the detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under Section 8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978.
2) The petitioner has contended that the impugned order has been issued without application of mind as the allegations mentioned in the grounds of detention have no nexus with the detenue and that the same have been fabricated by the police in order to justify its illegal action of detaining the detenue. It has been contended that the grounds of detention are vague and cryptic in nature and the same are based on stale incidents which have no proximate and live link with the detention order. It has been further contended that the safeguards provided under law have not been complied with in the instant case, inasmuch as whole of the material which form
Preventive detention orders must have a clear nexus with the alleged activities of the detenue, and the detaining authority must demonstrate application of mind in framing the grounds.
Preventive detention orders must provide specific grounds for effective representation; similarity in language does not imply non-application of mind by the detaining authority.
Preventive detention orders must provide all relevant material to the detenue for effective representation; failure to do so renders the order illegal.
Preventive detention orders must demonstrate independent reasoning and specificity in grounds to comply with constitutional safeguards under Article 22(5).
The detention order must comply with constitutional safeguards, including the provision of necessary material for an effective representation and cannot be based on stale incidents.
Preventive detention orders must provide sufficient grounds and comply with procedural safeguards; failure to do so can lead to quashment.
Preventive detention orders must provide all relevant material to the detenue for effective representation; failure to do so renders the order illegal.
Detention orders must comply with Article 22(5) of the Constitution, ensuring supply of grounds and consideration of representation; vagueness in grounds renders detention illegal.
Preventive detention orders must demonstrate application of mind by the detaining authority and provide necessary documents to the detenue to ensure effective representation, as mandated by Article 2....
Preventive detention orders must comply with constitutional safeguards, including providing the detenue with all relevant materials to ensure the right to make an effective representation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.