IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SANJEEV KUMAR, MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JJ.
Humanity Public School at Bassi Kalan Bari Brahmana District Samba through its proprietor Gaurav – Appellant
versus
UT of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary, School Education Department Civil Secretariat - Respondent
WP(C) No. 2829 of 2021 an d WP (C) 597 of 202
Decided on : 10-03-2025
(A) School Education Act, 2002 - Section 20A and 20C - Jurisdiction of Fee Fixation and Regulation Committee (FFRC) - The FFRC directed a private school to constitute a trust for operation and prohibited fee hikes until compliance - The petitioner challenged the authority of FFRC to issue such directions. (Paras 1-2, 24)
(B) Jurisdiction - The court held that FFRC's powers are limited to fee fixation and regulation, and it cannot mandate the establishment of a trust or society for a private school. (Paras 22-24)
Facts of the case:
The Humanity Public School challenged an order from FFRC requiring it to form a trust and halt fee increases until compliance with prior directives. The FFRC argued it had the authority to ensure schools are legally established.
Findings of Court:
The court found that FFRC's jurisdiction is confined to fee regulation and it cannot compel the formation of a trust.
Issues: The main issues were whether FFRC had the authority to mandate the formation of a trust and the scope of its jurisdiction regarding fee regulation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that FFRC's powers are strictly limited to the regulation of fees and do not extend to requiring a school to establish a trust, reaffirming that such matters fall under the Government's jurisdiction.
Result: The petition was allowed, and the FFRC's order was quashed.
JUDGMENT :
Sanjeev Kumar, J.
WP(C) No. 2829/2021
1. A private school by the name of “Humanity Public School” run by one Gourav Charak, invokes extraordinary jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India to throw challenge to an order bearing No. 785-FFRC (FF) of 2021 dated 26.11.2021 [“the impugned order”] passed by Chairperson, Committee for Fixation and Regulation of Fee of Private Schools [“FFRC”]. Vide order of FFRC, impugned in this petition, the school management of the petitioner-School has been directed to constitute a trust for running the school, providing further that till the needful is done by the petitioner and the directions contained in order No. 415/FRRC (FF) of 2021 dated 11.08.2021, are complied with, the management of petitioner-School shall not make any hike in any type of fee.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved and has assailed the impugned order of FFRC primarily on the ground that FFRC constituted under Section 20A of School Education Act, 2002 [“the Act of 2002”] is not competent to issue such directions and that the role and jurisdiction of FFRC is restricted to fixation and regulation of fee of private schools.
3. Mr. Ravinder Gupta, learned AAG appearing for the respondents would submit that the implicit in the power and jurisdiction of FFRC constituted under Section 20A of the Act of 2002 is the jurisdiction and competence to ensure that a private school is validly established in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 2002. He would argue that the FFRC is well within its powers not to entertain the case of a private school for fixation of fee unless such school complies with the requirements laid down in the Act of2002.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record, it is necessary to first advert to the relevant provisions of the Act of 2002 and the Rules framed thereunder. Section 20A, which deals with the constitution of Fee Fixation and Regulation Committee of private schools, reads thus:
20A. Constitution of Fee Fixation and Regulation Committee of private schools.- (1) The Government shall constitute a Committee to be known as the Committee for Fixation and Regulation of fee of Private Schools for the purposes of regulating and determining the fee in private schools in the Union territory.
(2) The Committee shall be headed by a Chairperson who has been a Judge of a high Court or a Government Officer who has been a Financial Commissioner of the Union territory or above.
(3) The members of the committee shall be such as may be prescribed by the Government.
(4) The Chairperson may co-opt any other independent person of repute or a representative or a recognised School Association as an expert member, but the total number of members of the Committee shall not exceed five.
5. From a plain reading of Section 20A, it is abundantly clear that a Committee to be constituted by the Government under this Section is only for the purpose of regulating and determining the fee in private schools in the UT of Jammu and Kashmir.
6. The term “private school” defined in Section 2(l) means a school established, run or maintained by any educational agency and recognised by the Government. The term “educational agency” is, however, defined in Section 2(f) which reads as under:-
2(f) “educational agency” means any individual, Society, Trust or body of persons registered with the Government and permitted to established, run or maintain any private school, under this Act.
7. It is, thus, evident that an educational agency could be an individual, a society, trust or body of persons registered with the Government and permitted to establish, run or maintain any private school under this Act. From the definition of „educational agency‟, we do not find any embargo put on an individual to establish a private school. The only requirement is that, it must be registered with the Government and permitted to establish, run or maintain the private school under the Act.
8. Sec
The Fee Fixation and Regulation Committee's jurisdiction is limited to fee regulation and does not extend to mandating the establishment of a trust for private schools.
(1) Director, Secondary Education has no authority to issue direction in respect of fee structure in respect of private unaided schools.(2) It is for school Management to reschedule payment of school....
The Fee Committee exceeded its jurisdiction by adjudicating complaints post-enactment of the Punjab Regulation of Fee of Unaided Educational Institutions Act, 2016, leading to the quashing of its ord....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Fee Regulatory Committee (FRC) is required to adhere to the provisions of the Gujarat Self-Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017....
The FRC, as a quasi-judicial authority, must follow the provisions of the Act and Rules, conduct individual case inquiry, and apply principles of natural justice.
Unaided recognized schools - Prohibition for not collecting part of annual charges not justified – School dependent only on fees collected to cover their salary, establishment and all other expenditu....
The Court emphasized the importance of complying with the legal provisions under the Gujarat Self-Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 and the Rules'2017, particularly in the context of th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.