HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAK H AT JAMM U Reserved on: 25.07.2024 Pronounced on: 20.08.2024 Case:- HCP No.50/202 4 CM No.1920/202 4 Dilbagh Singh, age 34 years , S/o Sh. Janak Singh , R/o Ward No. 4, Simbal Camp , R.S.Pura, Jammu .
At present lodged a t Central Jail, Kot Bhalwal, Jammu , Through the wife Amneet Kour, age 25 years , W/o Sh. Dilbagh Singh , R/o Malikpur,Miran Sahib , R. S. Pura, Jammu .
…..Petitione r Through: Mr. Karman Singh Johal, Advocate V s
1. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmi r through Commissioner/Secretary to Government , Home Department , Government of Jammu &Kashmir , Civil Secretariat, Jammu .
2. Financial Commissioner (ACS) , Home Department, Civil Secretariat , Jammu .
3. District Magistrate , Wazarat Road, Jammu .
4. Senior Superintendent of Police , J&K, Jammu .
5. Superintendent , Central Jail, Kot Bhalwal , Jammu .
.…. Respondent s Through: Mr. Rajesh Thappa, AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDG E
JUDGMENT :
01. Heard Mr. Karman Singh Johal, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the detention record produced by the respondent No. 3 – District Magistrate, Jammu.
02. Acting through his wife – Amneet Kour, the petitioner has petitioned this Court with the present writ petition instituted on 03.04.2024 seeking quashment of preventive detention slapped against him under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act,1978 by the respondent No. 3 – District Magistrate, Jammu and approved by the respondent No. 1 – Govt. of UT of Jammu & Kashmir.
03. The respondent No. 4 – Sr. Superintendent of Police(SSP), Jammu vide his communication No. CRB/Dossier/2022/21/ DPOJ dated 27.10.2022 came to submit a dossier to the respondent No. 3 – District Magistrate, Jammu on the basis of which the preventive detention of the petitioner under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 was solicited on the ground that the alleged activities of the petitioner are highly prejudicial to the maintenance of public order and, therefore, warranted his preventive detention.
04. In the dossier so framed against the petitioner, the respondent No. 4 – Sr. Superintendent of Police (SSP), Jammu came to refer the petitioner to be a hardcore criminal, desperate character and a history sheeter of Police Station Miran Sahib. The petitioner is also projected to be a habitual offender involved in many criminal offences violating the rule of law by indulging in attempts to murder/stabbings by using illegal fire arms and sharp edged weapons carrying out his criminal activities thereby terrorizing the innocent citizens thereby rendering his activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. The criminal cases in which the petitioner’s involvement came to be referred in the dossier are as under:-
I. FI R No. 98/2009 U/S 452/323/34/RPC 4/25 A. Act P/S Miran Sahib
Brief facts of the case are that on 30-07-2009, on the statement of injured person namely Raspreet Singh S/O Sohan Singh Caste Sikh R/O Makhanpur Gujran, Tehsil R.S. Pura Jammu to the effect that the subject alongwith his associates were doing some nasty taks outside his house. When he asked them not to do so, they started thrashing him. The complainant ran towards his house but the subject alongwith his associates entered his house and attacked him with sharp edged weapons (Tokas) and injured him badly. On this instant case was registered and subject and his associates were arrested and weapon of offence was recovered from their possession. The case was challaned before the Hon'ble Court of Law on 15-10- 2009.
II. FI R No. 97/2012 U/S 307/324/201/34/RPC 4/25 A. Act P/S. Bahu Fort
Brief facts of the case are that on the statement of Kamaljeet Singh S/O Gurdeep Singh R/O H. No. 73, Sector No. 07, Nanak Nagar, Jammu-wherein he stated that on 24-05-2012 the subject alongwith his two associates came on a motorcycle in the shop of Parveen Singh S/O Raghubir Singh R/O Talab Tillo Jammu at Transport Nagar, Narwal Jammu and attacked Parveen Singh with sharp edged weapons (Tokas) and injured him severely. They attacked him with criminal and common intention to kill him. On this instant case was registered in Police Station Bahu Fort Jammu. During the course of investigation subject and his associates were arrested and weapon of offence ie Tokas were recovered. Challan of the said case was produced before the Hon'ble Court of Law on 29-05-2014.
III. FIR No. 43/2014 U/S 323/341/RPC P/S Miran Sahib
Brief facts of the case are that the case has been registered on 23-03-2014 on the statement of injured person namely Tejinder Singh @ Happy S/O Mohinder Singh Caste Sikh R/O W.No.04 Simbal Camp to the effect that on the said date subject stopped him on a road that goes to his house and assaulted him, beating him to pulp and also injured him. The subject also threatened him to kill him next time. On this instant case stands registered at Police Station Miran Sahib and investigation was set into motion. After completion of inves
Preventive detention must be based on immediate threats to public order, not merely on past criminal behavior, and should not bypass ordinary criminal law.
Preventive detention under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act must be justified by current threats to public order, not merely by past criminal activities.
Preventive detention under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act must be justified by a clear threat to public order, not merely based on past criminal activities.
The distinction between law and order and public order is crucial in cases of preventive detention, and the impact on the community must be considered. The failure to respond to the petitioner's repr....
Preventive detention under the J&K Public Safety Act requires sufficient grounds related to public order; mere allegations without current relevance do not justify detention.
The necessity to place all material, including orders of granting bail, before the detaining authority to enable them to derive subjective satisfaction for the detention.
Preventive detention orders must demonstrate awareness of the detenue's custody status and cannot conflate grounds of public order and security of the State; failure to do so invalidates the order.
Preventive detention under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act must be justified by current threats to public order, not merely past criminal behavior.
Preventive detention under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act requires the detaining authority to provide grounds for detention and adhere to procedural safeguards, but the subjective satisfacti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.