SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(JK) 432

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAK H AT JAMM U Reserved on: 25.07.2024 Pronounced on: 20.08.2024 Case:- HCP No.50/202 4 CM No.1920/202 4 Dilbagh Singh, age 34 years , S/o Sh. Janak Singh , R/o Ward No. 4, Simbal Camp , R.S.Pura, Jammu .
At present lodged a t Central Jail, Kot Bhalwal, Jammu , Through the wife Amneet Kour, age 25 years , W/o Sh. Dilbagh Singh , R/o Malikpur,Miran Sahib , R. S. Pura, Jammu .
…..Petitione r Through: Mr. Karman Singh Johal, Advocate V s
1. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmi r through Commissioner/Secretary to Government , Home Department , Government of Jammu &Kashmir , Civil Secretariat, Jammu .
2. Financial Commissioner (ACS) , Home Department, Civil Secretariat , Jammu .
3. District Magistrate , Wazarat Road, Jammu .
4. Senior Superintendent of Police , J&K, Jammu .
5. Superintendent , Central Jail, Kot Bhalwal , Jammu .
.…. Respondent s Through: Mr. Rajesh Thappa, AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDG E

Preventive detention must be based on immediate threats to public order, not merely on past criminal behavior, and should not bypass ordinary criminal law.

Headnote:(A) Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 - Section 8 - Preventive detention - The petitioner challenged his preventive detention under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978, claiming it was based on stale grounds and punitive in nature, rather than preventive - The District Magistrate's order was found to be a verbatim reproduction of the police dossier, lacking independent subjective satisfaction - The court emphasized that preventive detention should not be used to bypass ordinary criminal law and must be based on immediate threats to public order. (Paras 6, 18, 32, 33)

(B) Preventive Detention - Legal principles - Preventive detention is not punitive; it aims to prevent future harm rather than punish past actions - The court reiterated that the distinction between 'public order' and 'law and order' is crucial, and preventive detention cannot be justified solely based on habitual criminality without immediate threats to public order. (Paras 21, 24, 30)

(C) Judicial Review - The court underscored the importance of judicial review in preventive detention cases, stating that detention orders based on stale grounds or without proper justification are illegal. (Paras 24, 32)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was detained under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978, based on a dossier alleging his involvement in multiple criminal activities, including attempts to murder and use of illegal weapons. The detention order was executed after a significant delay, raising questions about its necessity and legality.

Findings of Court:
The court found the preventive detention order illegal, emphasizing that it was a means to bypass ongoing criminal trials against the petitioner.

Issues: The main issues included whether the detention was justified under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act and whether it was based on stale grounds.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that preventive detention must be based on immediate threats to public order, not merely on past criminal behavior, and emphasized the need for independent assessment by the detention authority.

Result: The preventive detention order was quashed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released unless required in other cases.

JUDGMENT :

01. Heard Mr. Karman Singh Johal, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the detention record produced by the respondent No. 3 – District Magistrate, Jammu.

02. Acting through his wife – Amneet Kour, the petitioner has petitioned this Court with the present writ petition instituted on 03.04.2024 seeking quashment of preventive detention slapped against him under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act,1978 by the respondent No. 3 – District Magistrate, Jammu and approved by the respondent No. 1 – Govt. of UT of Jammu & Kashmir.

03. The respondent No. 4 – Sr. Superintendent of Police(SSP), Jammu vide his communication No. CRB/Dossier/2022/21/ DPOJ dated 27.10.2022 came to submit a dossier to the respondent No. 3 – District Magistrate, Jammu on the basis of which the preventive detention of the petitioner under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 was solicited on the ground that the alleged activities of the petitioner are highly prejudicial to the maintenance of public order and, therefore, warranted his preventive detention.

04. In the dossier so framed against the petitioner, the respondent No. 4 – Sr. Superintendent of Police (SSP), Jammu came to refer the petitioner to be a hardcore criminal, desperate character and a history sheeter of Police Station Miran Sahib. The petitioner is also projected to be a habitual offender involved in many criminal offences violating the rule of law by indulging in attempts to murder/stabbings by using illegal fire arms and sharp edged weapons carrying out his criminal activities thereby terrorizing the innocent citizens thereby rendering his activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. The criminal cases in which the petitioner’s involvement came to be referred in the dossier are as under:-

I. FI R No. 98/2009 U/S 452/323/34/RPC 4/25 A. Act P/S Miran Sahib

Brief facts of the case are that on 30-07-2009, on the statement of injured person namely Raspreet Singh S/O Sohan Singh Caste Sikh R/O Makhanpur Gujran, Tehsil R.S. Pura Jammu to the effect that the subject alongwith his associates were doing some nasty taks outside his house. When he asked them not to do so, they started thrashing him. The complainant ran towards his house but the subject alongwith his associates entered his house and attacked him with sharp edged weapons (Tokas) and injured him badly. On this instant case was registered and subject and his associates were arrested and weapon of offence was recovered from their possession. The case was challaned before the Hon'ble Court of Law on 15-10- 2009.

II. FI R No. 97/2012 U/S 307/324/201/34/RPC 4/25 A. Act P/S. Bahu Fort

Brief facts of the case are that on the statement of Kamaljeet Singh S/O Gurdeep Singh R/O H. No. 73, Sector No. 07, Nanak Nagar, Jammu-wherein he stated that on 24-05-2012 the subject alongwith his two associates came on a motorcycle in the shop of Parveen Singh S/O Raghubir Singh R/O Talab Tillo Jammu at Transport Nagar, Narwal Jammu and attacked Parveen Singh with sharp edged weapons (Tokas) and injured him severely. They attacked him with criminal and common intention to kill him. On this instant case was registered in Police Station Bahu Fort Jammu. During the course of investigation subject and his associates were arrested and weapon of offence ie Tokas were recovered. Challan of the said case was produced before the Hon'ble Court of Law on 29-05-2014.

III. FIR No. 43/2014 U/S 323/341/RPC P/S Miran Sahib

Brief facts of the case are that the case has been registered on 23-03-2014 on the statement of injured person namely Tejinder Singh @ Happy S/O Mohinder Singh Caste Sikh R/O W.No.04 Simbal Camp to the effect that on the said date subject stopped him on a road that goes to his house and assaulted him, beating him to pulp and also injured him. The subject also threatened him to kill him next time. On this instant case stands registered at Police Station Miran Sahib and investigation was set into motion. After completion of inves

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top