IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SANJEEV KUMAR, SANJAY DHAR
Bachan Lal S/o Dharam Chand – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through its Secretary Ministry of Defence – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjeev Kumar, J.
1. The petitioners invoke extraordinary writ jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to throw challenge to an order and judgment dated 14th February, 2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Srinagar at Jammu [“AFT”] in TA No.400/2017 titled Anjali Sharma v. Union of India and others, whereby the AFT has allowed the petition of respondent No.3 and directed respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to grant ordinary family pension to respondent No.3 on account of death of her husband Sep Sunny Ram as per rules.
2. The petitioners are parents of Late Sepoy Sunny Ram and had lodged a claim before the Army authorities for payment of family pension and other benefits on account of death of their son Late Sunny Ram to the exclusion of respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 was sought to be excluded from the benefit of family pension primarily on the ground that their son Sepoy Sunny Ram was killed by her and that the marriage between late Sunny Ram and respondent No.3 was nullity in the eye of law. The petition/application filed by respondent No.3 before the AFT was contested by the petitioners on the aforesaid grounds. The AFT
A legally wedded spouse is entitled to family pension unless proven guilty of murder or adultery, as unproven allegations do not affect pension rights.
A mother who has remarried is not entitled to family pension benefits as per Regulation 70 of Pension Regulations, 2008, which prioritizes the father when a son has nominated him as the pension benef....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.