SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(J&K) 33

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
UT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS REVENUE DEPARTMENT – Appellant
Versus
PIARAY LAL TICKOO AND ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. migrants challenge land acquisition on procedural lapses. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. appellants urge estoppel by knowledge and urgency. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. section 4 publication in local papers mandatory. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. section 5-a hearing obligation not fulfilled. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. section 11-b causes lapse on award delay. (Para 18)
6. relief molded per precedents despite construction. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

RAJNESH OSWAL, J.

1. The land of the respondents measuring 9 Kanals 4 Marlas comprising Survey Nos. 258, 258/1, 258/2, 259 and 593/267 situated at village Batapora, Tehsil and District Shopian was acquired by the appellants in terms of award dated 28.08.2007 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1990 (for short ‘the Act’).

2. The respondents filed a writ petition bearing OWP No. 779/2007 for quashing the proceedings for compulsory acquisition of their land initiated by the appellant No. 4 under the provisions of the Act and for quashing the communication dated 13.08.2007, whereby the respondents were notified that the final award would be pronounced on 28.08.2007 and were directed to appear before the appellant No. 4.

3. The res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top