SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(J&K) 65

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, J.
M/S Lumber India Corporation, Through Its Co-Proprietor Ghulam Nabi Dar (Senior Citizen) – Appellant 
Versus 
Union Territory Of J And K And Kashmir Thorugh Commissioner Cum Secretary To Govt. - Respondent 
WP(C) No. 733 of 2023, CM No. 1730 of 2023, CM No. 5002 of 2024
Decided On : 10-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.Y. Bhat, Sr. Adv. And Mr. Hamza Prince , Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Hakeem Aman Ali, Dy.AG Mr.Waseem Gul, GA

State and instrumentalities jointly liable for admitted dues on executed and accepted public works; cannot withhold payments citing no privity, paucity of funds or delays, violating Article 14; must pay with interest.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226 - Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 - Sections 15, 16 and 17 - Writ petition seeking release of admitted dues for executed public works - State and instrumentalities treated as single entity; no privity required when works allotted through facilitator, executed and accepted - Arbitrary withholding of payments despite admitted execution violative of Article 14 - Paucity of funds or administrative delays no defense post-acceptance - Writ maintainable for undisputed liability - State as model litigant bound to pay principal with interest on delay at three times bank rate or 6% if not released timely. (Paras 26, 27, 28, 31, 34, 37, 49, 57)

(B) State action - Contractual disputes - Cannot evade crystallized liability by technical pleas or internal inefficiencies - Obligation to ensure funds pre-allotment; post-execution payment mandatory - Systemic delays deprecated; accountability for erring officials. (Paras 33, 35, 36, 46, 47, 53, 56)

Facts of the case:
Writ petition filed by registered small scale industrial unit seeking direction for release of balance admitted dues of Rs. 47.47 lakhs for construction and renovation works allotted through facilitator, executed to satisfaction of indenting department in 2015-2016, handed over and partially paid; balance withheld since 2017 citing non-receipt of funds and no privity.

Findings of Court:
Respondents directed to release admitted liability of Rs. 47.47 lakhs within four weeks from production of order with petition; failing which, entitled to 6% interest per annum from due date.

Issues: Maintainability of writ for admitted contractual dues; liability of state instrumentalities despite facilitator role and no direct privity; validity of defense of fund non-availability post-execution and acceptance.

Ratio Decidendi: Foundational facts undisputed establish crystallized liability; state cannot shirk responsibility by inter-departmental coordination failures or post-facto pleas; Article 14 mandates fairness, prohibiting arbitrary delays; equity requires interest for deprivation of funds. Result : Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. writ seeks release of admitted dues for executed works. (Para 1 , 2)
2. delayed payment violates msmed act and article 14. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. sicop facilitator not liable without department funds. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
4. undisputed facts crystallize payment liability. (Para 25 , 26)
5. state instrumentalities single entity overrides privity. (Para 27)
6. writ maintainable against arbitrary state withholding. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
7. prolonged delay arbitrary under article 14. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
8. funds paucity invalid post-execution acceptance. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
9. interest for delay; enforce state accountability. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
10. order payment within 4 weeks else 6% interest. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57)

JUDGMENT :

WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, J.

Brief Facts

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court, inter alia, seeking a direction for release of admitted dues arising out of works duly allotted by the respondents. It is the case of the petitioner that the works stood executed in accordance with the approved specifications and to the satisfaction of the competent authorities, yet the admitted amount payable has remained withheld for several years without any justifiable cause.

2. It is averred that despite repeated representations and sustained efforts made by the petitioner for release of its legitimate dues, no effective steps were taken by the respondents, thereby constraining the petitioner to approach this Court.

SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER;

3. The Learned counsel Mr. Hamza Prince for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions for release of admitted dues arising out of works duly executed by the petitioner pursuant to allotments made by the respondents. It is contended that the petitioner has fulfilled all contractual obligations, and the works in question stand completed in accordance with the approved specifications and to the satisfaction of the concerned authorities.

4. It is further submitted that the inaction on the part of the respondents is arbitrary and unreasonable, being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the statutory mandate contained in the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, which obligates timely payment along with interest in case of delay.

5. It is submitted that M/s Lumber India Corporation is a registered Small Scale Industrial Unit engaged in the construction of new buildings, renovation of old structures, and manufacture of joinery items/furniture and has undertaken works for various Government Departments and its performance, including quality of construction and supply of goods, has consistently been found satisfactory.

6. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner unit has been executing construction works and supplying joinery/furniture items and materials to Government Departments and Government-owned Corporations through the Jammu and Kashmir Small Scale Industrial Development Corporation.

7. It is submitted that respondent No. 3, vide communication dated 15.12.2014, requested SICOP to furnish a pro-forma bill for construction of a hut at Tourist Village Cheshma Shahi. In response thereto, the Project Engineer, SICOP, vide communication dated 06.01.2015, furnished a detailed cost estimate with a request for acceptance of the offer and release of funds for execution of the work.

8. It is further submitted that the Project Engineer, SICOP, vide communication dated 16.01.2015, authorized the petitioner unit to undertake construction of a 2 BHK Hut (Duplex) at Tourist Village Cheshma Shahi, with a direction to complete the work expeditiously in accordance with the specifications contained in the estimate.

9. It is submitted that a similar order was placed by the Pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top