HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
TASHI RABSTAN, PUNEET GUPTA, JJ.
UT of J&K & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Muzammal Shah & Ors. – Respondent
WP(C) No. 1806/2022 & CM No. 5058/2022
Decided on : 03-05-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to recovery of excess pay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. grounds for challenging the tribunal's order. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal principles on recovery of excess payments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGEMENT :
Tashi Rabstan, J.
1. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 28.04.2021 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, Jammu in T.A. No. 1580/2020 clubbed with O.A. No. 668/2021 whereby the Tribunal has inter alia directed that the petitioners herein shall not recover the amount already paid, in the form of higher scales of pay, and in case, any component was recovered, the same shall be refunded without interest within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
2. Relief prayed for in this writ petition is as:
3. The facts of the case in nutshell are:
That the respondents herein were initially engaged in the department on daily rated basis and thereafter came to be regularized on permanent basis. In the year 1993, a Circular came to be issued vide No. PHEJ/20094-20013, dated 08.03.1993 which provided for grant of one Higher Pay Grade to those officials who are working in lower grades of the posts shall be placed in the higher grades subject to various conditions. On 11.06.1993, another Circular No. PHEJ/3417-37, dated 11.06.1993 whereby it has been provided that all those employees who have notionally completed at least three years in the lower grade and have physically worked against the post for at least one year shall be eligible for promotion to the next higher grade.
It is averred in the petition that in compliance of Government Order No. 277-F, dated 06.06.2018, the Chief Engineer PHE Department Jammu had issued a Circular bearing No. PHEJ/GE/12082-114, dated 10.11.2018 directing therein not to extend the benefits to those employees who were borne on regular establishment after 1993 and had further directed that the benefits so extended are hereby withdrawn with immediate effect and extra salary paid shall be recovered under rules from the salary of the employees.
Aggrieved of the Government order dated 06.06.2018 (supra) and the subsequent circular, respondents filed writ petition SWP No. 15/2019 which was transferred by this Court to Central Administration Tribunal and renumbered as TA No. 1580/2020. Petitioners are aggrieved of the order passed in the aforesaid TA which constrained them to file the present writ petition.
4. The impugned order is challenged by the petitioners, inter alia, on the following grounds:
b. Because the Chief Engineer PHE Department Jammu had issued a Circular vide No. PHEJ/GE/12082-114, dated 10.11.2018 for not giving the benefits to those employees who were borne on regular establishment after 1993 in furtherance of Government Order No. 277-F of 2018, dated 06.06.2018, whereby directed that the benefits so extended are hereby withdrawn with immediate effect and extra salary paid shall be recovered under rules from the salary of the employee
B.J. Akkara (Col.) (Retd.) Versus Govt. of India & Ors.
Shyam Babu Verma & Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors.
State of Punjab & Ors. etc. Versus Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc.
Syed Abdul Qadir & Ors. Versus State of Bihar & Ors.
Thomas Daniel Versus State of Kerala & Ors.
Recovery of excess payments made to employees is impermissible where no fault exists on the employee's part and payments have spanned over five years, protecting livelihood rights.
Recoveries from retired employees based on erroneous salary payments are impermissible, emphasizing equitable treatment and judicial discretion in enforcing employee rights.
Where court arrives at conclusion, that recovery if made from the employee, would be iniquitous or harsh or arbitrary to such an extent, as would far outweigh the equitable balance of employer's righ....
Recovery of excess payments from employees without their fault violates principles of equity and fairness, especially when recovery occurs post-retirement and after a significant period.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.