SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 456

TAPEN SEN
Parmanand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
B. S. R. T. C. – Respondent


ORDER

Tapan Sen, J.

1. Heard Mrs. Jaya Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. P.P.N. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed off at this stage.

2. In the instant writ application, the petitioner has made a prayer for quashing the order dated 8.6.2001 (Annexure 6) passed by the Administrator. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation. Patna (Respondent No. 2) whereby and whereunder the petitioner was sought to be dismissed from service. The petitioner has also made a prayer for quashing the order dated 14.6.2001 (Annexure-7) passed by the Divisional Manager. BSRTC. Jamshedpur Division (Respondent No. 5) communicating the order of dismissal to the petitioner.

3. According to the petitioner he was appointed as a driver of the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity and precision as BSRTC). On 17.2.1993 he received a charge-sheet dated 15.2.1993 (Annexure-1) wherein it was biter alia, stated that while returning from Patna as a driver of a Deluxe bus of the BSRTC bearing Registration No. BR 16A 0980. he caused an accident of the said vehicle near





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top