SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 1028

GURUSHARAN SHARMA, LAKSHMAN URAON
Management Of Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sarita Narayan – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard the parties. After death of the her husband, P.K. Narayan in harness, the respondent No. 1 herein was given compassionate appointment in the year 1977, by the Management of the Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited, Ranchi. During his service period, her husband on 1.2.1969, in a declaration had given the age of his wife, namely, the respondent No. 1 to be approximately 24 years.

2. Although it appears that the respondent No. 1 was already a graduated at the time of her compassionate appointment, but she failed to produce any document in proof of here date of birth and, therefore, on her oral declaration, in Coloumn-8 of the Personal Data Form (Annexure 4), her age was mentioned as 32 years. The said form was duly signed by her. Subsequently, it appear that on 1.12.1979 she got issued a school leaving certificate from J.K. High School, Begusarai, wherein her date of birth was mentioned as 15.9.1948, whereas according to her age mentioned in Personal Date Form, her date of birth comes to the year 1945. It further appears that on 6.8.1990, the said school leaving certificate as well as the matriculation certificate were produced by her before the A.P.O. (EST/ MOE, HQrs.)











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top