SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 247

N.N.TIWARI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Raju Mahato – Appellant
Versus
Birsa Agricultural University – Respondent


ORDER

Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.

1. Complaining public injury caused by the alleged illegal appointments made by the respondent-Birsa Agricultural University, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs in this writ application in the name of public interest :--

(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction restraining the respondent-University from making any further illegal appointments in absence of statute;

(ii) Writ, order or direction to set up any competent authority/independent body for inquiry in respect of illegal appointments made by the respondent- university on the post of assistant without even conducting any written test or typing test, which is mandatory;

(iii) For quashing the advertisement published by

respondent-university in various news papers on 2.4.2004 whereby and whereunder various posts of University Professor-cum-Chief Scientist and Chief Scientist-cum-University Professor of various disciplines has been published by respondent-University.

2. The petitioner has Introduced himself as an ex-member of the Board of Management of the University and a public spirited person. According to the petitioner, the respondent-University was earlier known as Re












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top