SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 521

M.Y.EQBAL
Subodh Kr. Jha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1.In this writ application the petitioner has challenged the advertisement No. 03/2004-05 so far it relates to cut-off date fixed for appearing in the examination for appointment on the post of Additional Public Prosecutor.

2. The petitioner is an Advocate presently practicing in Dumka Civil Court. The Jharkhand Public Service Commission (in short the commission), vide its advertisement No. 03/2004-05 invited applications for appointment on the post of Additional Public Prosecutor. One of the conditions put in the advertisement is that the upper age limit as on 31.1.2005 should not exceed 35 years for the general category candidates.

3. Mr. Mazumdar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that although the State of Jharkhand came into existence in November, 2000, no examination for filling up the post of Public Prosecutor was held and for the first time the impugned advertisement has been issued for filing up the post of Public Prosecutors and, therefore, relaxation in age should be given to those candidates who have completed 35 years of age before the cut-off date te. 31.5.2005.

4. Mr. S. Pipriwal, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of th




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top