SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Jhk) 958

M. Y. Eqbal & Jaya Roy, JJ.
Md. Guizar Mian @ Guizar Mian ... Appellant
Versus
Zohra Khatoon ... Respondent
FA No. 143 of 2008
Decided On : 20.8.2008

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Sajid Warsi, M.I. Khan.

Headnote:Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 125—Family Courts Act, 1984—Section 19(4)—Revision and not appeal lie against order passed by Family Court u/s 125—Appellant allowed to convert the appeal into a criminal revision. (Paras 8 to 10)

Order

This appeal has been placed before this Bench for deciding the maintainability of this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act.

2. The respondent filed an application before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Hazaribagh under Section 125 Cr.P.C. claiming maintenance from the respondent. The case of the respondent is that she was earlier married with the elder brother of the appellant and after his premature death she was again solemnized marriage with the appellant in the year 1973 and, thereafter, both started living together. Out of the wedlock three children were born. Respondent's further case is that appellant again contacted second marriage with one Rabiya Khatoon and started neglecting the respondent and her children. The case was contested by the appellant on various grounds. Both oral and documentary evidences were adduced by both the parties. The Family Court after discussing and considering the entire evidences, recorded a finding that appellant is the husband of respondent and he contacted second marriage and started neglecting the respondent and her children. Accordingly, the application for maintenance filed under Section 125. Cr.P.C. was finally disposed of directing the appellant to pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/- (two thousand) per month to the respondent as maintenance allowance.

3. On the question of maintainability, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that against the impugned order, the appellant filed criminal revision before this Court being Criminal Revision No. 845 of 2007 but the same was permitted to be withdrawn by order 13.6.2008, as the learned Judge did not incline to entertain criminal revision. By the aforesaid order the said criminal revision was dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to seek relief under the provisions of law. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that in the aforesaid premises, appellant had no option but to again move this Court by preferring appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act.

4. Section 7 of the Family Courts Act confers power upon the Family Court to exercise all jurisdictions exercisable by any District Court or any subordinate Civil Court under any law for the time being in force. Section 7 reads as under:-

"7. Jurisdictivn.-(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall-

(a) have and exercise all the jurisdiction exercisable by any District Court or any subordinate Civil Court under any law for the time being in force in respect of suits and proceedings of the nature referred to in the Explanation; and

(b) be deemed, for the purpose of exercising such jurisdiction under such law, to be a District Court or, as the case may be such subordinate Civil Court for the area to which the jurisdiction of the Family Court extends.

Explanation.-The suits and proceedings referred to in this sub-section are suits and proceedings of the following nature namely:-

(a) a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage for a decree of nullity of marriage (declaring the marriage to be null and void or, as the case may be, annulling the marriage) or restitution of conjugal rights or judicial separation or dissolution of marriage.

(b) a suit or proceeding for a declaration as to the validity of a marriage or as to the matrimonial status of any person;

(c) a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage with respect to the property of the parties or of either of them;

(d) a suit or proceeding for an order of injunction in circumstances arising out of a marital relationship;

(e) a suit or proceeding for a declaration as to the legitimacy of any person;

(f) a suit or proceeding for maintenance;

(g) a suit or proceeding in relation to the guardianship of the person or the custody of, or access to any minor.

(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall also have and exercise-

(a) the jurisdiction exercisable by a Magistrate of the first class under Chapter IX (relating to order for maintenan

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top