D.G.R.PATNAIK
Steel Authority of. India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bokaro Steel City – Respondent
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.- Heard Shri Rajiv Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri V.P. Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent no. 2. Challenge in this writ application is to the Award dated. 12.6.1995 (Annexure-3), passed by the Presiding Officer, labour Court, Bokaro in M.J. Case No. 5/1.991, whereby the claim made by the respondent no. 2 under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, has been allowed in his favour and against the petitioner-SAIL.
2. The case before the Labour Court filed by the respondent no. 2 under Section 33C(2) of the to. Act, against the petitioner/SAIL, BSL, was for computation of money/benefits due on account of nonpayment of construction allowance/personal pay, with effect from 30.11.1970 and for payment of the amount which was deducted from his wages, and also for payment of promotional benefits, details whereof has been stated in Annexures-A, Band C to the claim application.
3. The claim, as advanced by the respondent no. 2, was on the following grounds:-
He was appointed under the respondent-SAIL in the Bokaro Steel Plant as Construction Supervisor on 14.6.1969. As per the terms of his employment, he was paid con
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.