SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 342

LAKSHMANA RAO
AKHILESH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jayanti Mukherji, KRISHNA MURARI KUMAR, RAJIV RANJAN MISHRA, T.R.BAJAJ

Judgment :

LAKSHMANA RAO, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER Akhilesh Sharma has filed this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ / order / direction for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the F. I, R. and investigation to connection with Chaibasa Sadar PS Case No, 35 of 1995 (GRNo. 231/95) Including the order dated 20-1-2003 passed by learned judicial Magistrate, Chaibasa and also for quashing the order dated 7-3-2002 where by the cognizance of the offence has been taken against the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case has been initiated on the written information of Gandhi bhagat (Respondent No. 2) that under jawahar Rojgar Yojna. Deputy Commissioner. West Singhbhum, Chaibasa had sanctioned Rs. 70,60,883. 50 to Divisional forest Officer. Social Forestry Division for plantation of plants on both sides outside chaibasa Municipality and also on both sides of canal embankment and the scheme was to be completed by 31st March, 1995. Local press reporter Amarendra Kumar gyani pointed out some Irregularities in execution of the scheme in the meeting of district Programme Implementation Committee held on 14-11-1994 at Chaibasa. An








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top