D.N.PATEL
Renu Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
1. Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to delete respondent no. 7 as party respondent to this petition.
2. Permission, as sought for, is granted to delete respondent no. 7 as party respondent.
3. Amendment shall be carried out with red ink during course of the day.
4. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was legally appointed on the post of "Shiksha Doot" on 15th November, 2002 vide order at Annexure1 to the memo of the present petition. Thereafter, the petitioner worked honestly, sincerely, diligently and to the satisfaction of the respondents for several years.
5. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that without giving any notice and without giving any opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, the services of the petitioner have been terminated with effect from 10th January, 2006 (Annexure2) and therefore, it is prayed that the order at Annexure2 dated 10th January, 2006 may be quashed and set aside so far it relates to the termination of the services of the present petitioner.
6. Counsel for the respondents State is unable to point out that for what reason, the services of the present petitioner have been terminated. It is fu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.