R.R.PRASAD
Manju Singh @ Baby – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Devi – Respondent
1. The sole plaintiff-Kedar Nath Sahu filed a suit for eviction of the defendant-Jagdish Singh from a suit premises being building/structure and the land appertaining to Khata No. 74, Plot Nos. 137 and 138 corresponding to Holding No. 24/A of Ward No. 11- B situated at Madhukam, P.S.–Sukhdeonagar, District– Ranchi on the ground of bona fide requirement of the suit premises for setting up business for two son-in-laws and also on the ground of sub-letting it to different persons. Thus, said suit for eviction was filed under Section 11(i) (c) as well as under Section 11(i) (a) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act (for short the Act).Subsequently, an amendment in the plaint was brought on 3.2.1989, whereby certain facts concerning bona fide requirement were added. When the written statement was filed on behalf of the defendant, another amendment was brought on 7.12.1990, whereby one more ground available for eviction under Section 11(i) (d) of the Act was pleaded, whereby eviction was sought on the ground of default in making payment of rent from October, 1986 to January, 1987. Consequently, decree for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.