SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Jhk) 121

JAYA ROY
Vijoy Kishore Sahay – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Jaya Roy, J.

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Vigilance.

2. Petitioner has filed the instant case for quashing the order dated 18.1.2010 passed by Sri Binay Kant Khan, the Special Judge Vigilance, Ranchi whereby he has taken cognizance under Sections 467, 468, 469, 471, 477A, 409, 120B, 109, 423, 424 and 201 of I.P.C. and Sections 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in Special Case No. 17 of 2000 against the Petitioner and also for quashing the entire Criminal Proceeding in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 30 of 2000.

3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the instant Patna Sadar Vigilance P.S. Case No. 30 of 2000 has been registered on 13.11.2000 by one Shri Shiv Kumar Jha, Dy. S.P.-cum Vigilance, P.S. In-charge, Patna against 30 persons including the Petitioner who is arrayed at Serial No. (b-3) in the list of the accused persons in the F.I.R.

The short case according to the aforesaid information dated 10.11.2000 submitted by Karam Dayal Oraon, Dy. S.P. Vigilance, Ranchi, camp Patna is that an enquiry team was constituted in the Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna to

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top