R.BANUMATHI, SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Garhwa – Appellant
Versus
Saryu Prasad Gupta – Respondent
R.Banumathi, C.J.
As against the judgment and decree passed by the Single Judge in the First Appeals filed against the Land Acquisition Cases whether Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable, is the point falling for consideration in these appeals.
2. Shorn of details, brief facts which led to the filing of these Letters Patent Appeals are as follows : The appellant is a statutory body established under the provisions of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (hereinafter Market Committee). For establishment of market yards at Garhwa, as per the requirements of the provisions of the Market Act, 22.71 acres of land was acquired at Garhwa by the State Government by Government Notification, which was published in the District Gazette on 16.6.1977. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed the value of the land at Rs.16,900/-per acre for the land situated upto 200 ft. from road side and Rs.12,675/-per acre for the lands beyond 200 feet. The award was passed on 17.8.1978. On 28.8.1978 claimants received the payment of compensation under protest. Seeking enhancement of compensation, Reference was made under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act and those cases were registered as (i)
P.S.Sathappan v. Andhra Bank Ltd. (AIR 2004 SC 5152) ; [(2004) 11 SCC 672]
Kamal Kumar Dutta & Ano. v. Ruby General Hospital Ltd. [(2006) 7 SCC 613]
Modh. Saud and Ano. v. Dr.(Maj.) Shaikh Mahfooz [(2010) 13 SCC 517]
Salem Advocate Bar Association Tamil Nadu v. Union of India (AIR 2003 SC 189)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.