R.R.PRASAD
Pramod Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. This application is directed against the order dated 11.8.2011 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in Mohanpur P.S. case no.61 of 2011 (G.R.No.232 of 2011) whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a case was lodged as Mohanpur P.S. Case no.61 of 2011 (G.R.No.232 of 2011) with respect to commission of offence under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, Dewar, bhaisur and Gotni. The matter was taken up for investigation. During investigation, the police did find complicity of only the husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law and not against these petitioners, who happen to be Dewar, Gotni and Bhaisur and therefore, submitted charge sheet against them. So far these petitioners are concerned, the investigation was kept open. When the charge sheet was submitted, the court took cognizance of the offences against them and even committed the case to the court of
Nupur Talwar vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [(2012) 2 SCC 188]
M/s. India Corat Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka and others [(1989) 2 SCC 132]
Kishun Singh and others vs. State of Bihar [(1993) 2 SCC 16]
SWIL Limited vs. State of Delhi and others [(2001) 6 SCC 670]
Rajinder Prasad vs. Bashir and others [(2001) 8 SCC 522]
Kishore Singh and others vs. State of Bihar and others [(2004) 13 SCC 11]
Kishore Prasad vs. State of Bihar and another [(1996) 4 SCC 495]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.