SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Jhk) 88

R.R.PRASAD
Pramod Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate
For the State: A.P.P

Order

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also learned counsel appearing for the State.

2. This application is directed against the order dated 11.8.2011 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in Mohanpur P.S. case no.61 of 2011 (G.R.No.232 of 2011) whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a case was lodged as Mohanpur P.S. Case no.61 of 2011 (G.R.No.232 of 2011) with respect to commission of offence under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, Dewar, bhaisur and Gotni. The matter was taken up for investigation. During investigation, the police did find complicity of only the husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law and not against these petitioners, who happen to be Dewar, Gotni and Bhaisur and therefore, submitted charge sheet against them. So far these petitioners are concerned, the investigation was kept open. When the charge sheet was submitted, the court took cognizance of the offences against them and even committed the case to the court of


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top