H. C. Mishra, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the Informant.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 29.1.2014, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara, in G.R. Case No.972 of 2013, whereby the cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for the offence under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, even though the petitioners were not sent up for trial upon investigation in the case and the final form was submitted in their favour.

3. The facts of this case lie in a short compass. The petitioners have been made accused in Jamtara P.S. Case No.338 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No.972 of 2013, for the offences under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of the IPC, on the allegation that the accused persons being the husband and the in-laws of the deceased lady used to subject her to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry and ultimately, they committed her dowry death. The dead body of the deceased was found hanging in the house. The case was instituted against the husband, and the petitioners, who are the father-in-law, mother-in-law and aunt-in-law of the deceased and t