H.C. Mishra, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The complainant opposite party No.2, has not appeared in spite of valid service of notice upon him.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21.6.2001 passed by Sri Sitaram Prasad, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in Complaint Case No. 82 of 2000, whereby prima facie offence under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code has been found against the accused persons, including the petitioner, and summons were directed to be issued against them. The petitioner has also challenged the entire criminal proceeding against him in the said compliant case.

3. Complaint Case No. 82 of 2000 was filed by the complainant opposite party No.2, in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, wherein, the petitioner has also been made accused along with other accused persons. The petitioner has been described as the Managing Director of Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation (herein after referred to as the 'Corporation'). According to the complaint case, the complainant was a licensee under the Bihar Trade Articles (License Unification) Order, 1984, and was carrying out his