RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Surendra Mohan Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
R. Mukhopadhyay, J.
Heard Mr. Abhay Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel for the State. No one appears on behalf of O.P. No. 2.
2. In this application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings in connection with Complaint Case No. C-210/2000 including the order dated 3.10.2000, passed by Shri Mahendra Pratap Singh, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra, by which cognizance has been taken for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 451, 452 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution story, as would appear from the complaint petition instituted by the complainant-opposite party no. 2 herein, is that the complainant was married with Anita Kumari (petitioner no. 3), on 11.5.1999. It is alleged that on 23.5.1999, the accused nos. 1 and 3 along with some unknown persons forcibly took away accused no. 4 without taking permission of the complainant and they had also taken away ornaments, cloths and other articles, worth Rs. 40,000/-. It is alleged that the complainant on several occasion tried to get the Bidai of his wife but she disagreed and since the accused persons had
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.