SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
SLL-SML (Joint Venture Consortium) – Appellant
Versus
Central Coalfields Limited – Respondent
Per SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J.
Aggrieved by rejection of the bid submitted by SLL-SML Joint Venture Consortium, the petitioners have challenged communication dated 11.09.2015 whereby, rejection of the bid on the ground of ‘incomplete document’ was communicated.
2. The petitioner no.1 is a Joint Venture Consortium in which M/s Sical Logistics Limited–petitioner no.2 is lead partner. In response to e-Tender Notice dated 05.08.2015, petitioner no.1-JVC submitted its bid including, a Bank Guarantee for Rs. one crore as Earnest Money Deposit. On 11.09.2015, the offer of the petitioner-Joint Venture Consortium was summarily rejected on the ground of ‘documents incomplete’ and the Joint Venture Consortium was not allowed to participate in the reverse bidding. Immediately, through email the respondents were requested to disclose the details of incomplete documents submitted by the Joint Venture Consortium. On 15.09.2015, the respondent no. 3 disclosed that the BG was not in the prescribed format. A legal notice was issued to the respondent-CCL and M/s mjunction Services Pvt. Ltd. however, the respondents did not respond to the same. Constrained, the petitioners approached this Cou
Asia Foundation and Construction Ltd. Vs. Trafalgar House Construction (I) Ltd. & Ors.
B. D. Yadav and M.R. Meshram Vs. Administration of the City” AIR 1984 Bom 351
Bank of India Vs. K. Mohan Das & Ors.
Central Bank of India Ltd., Amritsar Vs. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd.
General Assurance Society Ltd. Vs. Chandmull Jain” reported in (1966) 3 SCR 500
Jalmahal Resources Pvt. Ltd. Vs. K. P. Sharma & Ors.” (2014) 8 SCC 804
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.