SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Jhk) 1408

R.R.PRASAD
Mahabir Kanshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. Birendra Burman & Ranjeet Kumar Singh
For the Vigilance : Mr. Shailesh

ORDER :

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Vigilance.

2. This application has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of Vigilance Case No. 25 of 2000 (Special Case No. 12 of 2000) registered under Sections 420/423/424/467/468/469/471/477/201/120-B/109 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 13(1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as well as the order dated 4.12.2009, whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence punishable under Sections 420/423/424/467/468/469/471/477/201/120B/109 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 13(1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, has been taken against the petitioner.

3. The facts, giving rise to this application, are that certain land measuring total area of 10.95 acres, appertaining to Khata No. 360, Plot No. 1260 situated at Mouza-Hundru was recorded in record of right as Gairmazurwa Land. Out of the said land measuring 10.95 acres Jamabandi with respect to land measuring 3.12 acres was opened in the name of Chandan Sao S/o Samu Sao and Bharat Sao. Much thereafter, one rent receipt was iss

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top