SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 390

PRAMATH PATNAIK
Subrato Sengupta – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Shruti Shrestha, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Pramath Patnaik, J.

In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has sought for quashing of the entire departmental proceeding initiated vide charge sheet dated 17.12.2015 on the ground that the alleged charges are analogous and similar to charges levelled against the petitioner in the pending criminal case and for issuance of mandamus directing the respondents to stay the departmental proceedings based on similar and analogous facts till the conclusion of the criminal case.

2. The facts, as disclosed in the writ application, in a nutshell is that the petitioner was posted as a Medium Enterprise Relationship Manager, (MERM) at Commercial Branch, Bokaro for the period from 12.06.2006 to 08.12.2009. On 28.07.2014, on the basis of the complaint lodged to the Superintendent of Police, Economic Offence Wing (EWO), CBI, Ranchi on the allegation of criminal conspiracy, forgery, cheating in the matter of obtaining Cash credit limit and term loans of various accounts on the basis of false and fabricated documents. Five F.I.Rs., namely, R.C 8(S)/14, R.C 9(S)/14, R.C 10 (S)/14, R.C 11(S)/14, R.C 12(S)/14 have been registered by CBI for the offence under Sections 120 B read with


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top