RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Unity Infraprojects Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
In the instant writ application, the petitioner had prayed for the following reliefs:-
(a) For issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the decision of the Tender Committee dated 28th May, 2015 held under the Chairmanship of the Engineer-in-Chief, Building Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand (Respondent no. 3) to the extent the petitioner’s Technical Bid has been declared ineligible.
(b) For issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the Technical Bid of the petitioner strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions as laid down pursuant to the e-procurement notice dated 13.03.2015 invited for the works of “construction of new Jharkhand High Court Building Complex at Dhurwa, Ranchi in Jharkhand for the year 2014-15” and, thereafter, to consequently declare the petitioner’s technical bid as eligible.
(c) For issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the Price Bid of the petitioner and if the Bid submitted by the petitioner is found most competitive, then to consequently proceed to allot work
Ratnagiri Gas and Power (P) Ltd. Vs. RDS Projects Ltd
Sorath Builders Vs. Shreejikrupa Buildcon Ltd.
Jagdish Mandal Vs. State of Orissa & Ors. reported in (2007) 14 SCC 517
National Highways Authority of India Vs. Ganga Enterprises
Raunaq International Ltd. Vs. I.V.R. Construction Ltd. & Ors reported in (1999) 1 SCC 492
Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner
Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India reported in (1994) 6 SCC 651
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.