H.C.MISHRA, S.N.PATHAK
Anil Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
H.C. Mishra, J.
As common question is involved in all these writ applications, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioners in all these writ applications and the learned counsel for the State.
3. The petitioners in all these writ applications were appointed on daily wages/contract basis on different posts and they are aggrieved by the non-consideration of regularisation of their services, as a cut-off date has been prescribed in the notification issued by the State of Jharkhand in its Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa Department, notifying the Rules, namely, "Jharkhand Sarkar Ke Adhinasth Aniyamit Rup Se Niyukt Ewam Karyarat Karmiyo Ki Sewa Niyamitikaran Niyamawali, 2015" (hereinafter referred to the "Regularisation Rules, 2015").
4. As the nomenclature of the above Rules suggests, these Rules have been framed by the State Government for regularisation of the services of irregularly appointed employees of the State Government. These Rules have been framed as one time measure for regularisation of services of the irregularly appointed Government employees in the State of Jhar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.