SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 1400

PRAMATH PATNAIK
Ram Bilash Sahu, S/o Late Shiv Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Abhay Kr. Singh, Krishna Murari
For the Respondents: Ms. Shivani Verma

JUDGMENT :

Pramath Patnaik, J.

1. In the instant writ application, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for quashing the purported enquiry report/order dated 24.02.2014 passed by the second departmental enquiry officer (respondent no.5) in connection with departmental enquiry initiated against the petitioner dated 08.11.2010 by the respondent, Road Construction Department and for quashing of follow-up second show cause notice bearing letter dated 24.06.2014 issued under the signature of respondent no.4 and for quashing of follow up impugned order of punishment bearing notification dated 03.12.2015 (Annexure-14) issued under the signature of respondent no.3 pertaining to punishment inflicted to the petitioner.

2. The brief facts, as emanated from the writ application, in a nutshell is that earlier two writ applications bearing W.P.(S) No.7493 of 2013 challenging the very initiation of the departmental proceeding on the same set of charges, facts and materials to that of the parallel criminal proceeding and W.P.(S) No.2640 of 2014 has been also filed by the petitioner challenging the appointment of the second enquiry officer (respondent no.5) and both the writ petitions stated to be pen










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top