SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Jhk) 164

PRAMATH PATNAIK
Arbind Kumar, S/o Shri Amrendra Kumar 'Amar' – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand Public Service Commission – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pandey Neeraj Roy, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ajit Kumar, Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Pramath Patnaik, J.

Challenging the selection process with respect to the posts advertized vide Advertisement (Annexure-1) and the results of the written test vide Annexure-4 and the notice dated 06.06.2007 by the J.P.S.C., whereby the vacancies in Mechanical Engineering have been reduced from 25 to 22 vide Annexure-3 to the writ application, the instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, praying for direction to the respondents to start the fresh selection process.

2. The brief facts leading to filing of the writ application are that the petitioner applied for the post of the Mechanical Engineer in pursuance to the Advertisement published by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission for different posts vide Annexure-1 to the writ petition. The petitioner appeared in the preliminary examination. On 06.06.2007, J.P.S.C. published a notice in the newspaper revising the vacancy in different subjects and the vacancies in Mechanical Engineering were reduced from 25 to 22 vide Annexure-3 to the writ petition. The name of the petitioner did not find plac





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top