IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, B.B. MANGALMURTI, JJ.
Mukesh Kumar and Another – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and Others – Respondents
W.P. (S) No. 5128 of 2017
Decided On : 06-12-2017
Rule 7 (ka) and (kha) - Jharkhand State Police Sub-Inspector Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Appointment Rules - Rule 726(III) - Rule 721 - Rule 726 - Rule 834 - Rule 835 - Article 309 of the Constitution of India - Section 46(3) of the Police Act, 1861 - Appointment through limited departmental competitive exam to the post of Sub-Inspector - Major punishment - Rationality of the impugned rules - Eligibility criteria - Clean service record - Constitutionality of subordinate legislation
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenged the vires of Rule 7 (ka) and (kha) of the Jharkhand State Police Sub-Inspector Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Appointment Rules, 2016, on the grounds of disqualification for admission to a promotion list and ineligibility due to major punishment. The court analyzed the provisions of the Police Manual, the impugned rules, and the rationality of the eligibility criteria for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector through limited departmental competitive exam.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned rules were framed under the provisions of the Constitution of India and the Police Act, 1861, and created a channel of appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector through limited departmental competitive exam. The court upheld the rationality of the eligibility criteria and dismissed the writ petition.
Issues: The issues involved the vires of Rule 7 (ka) and (kha) in relation to disqualification for admission to a promotion list and ineligibility due to major punishment, and the rationality of the impugned rules for appointment through limited departmental competitive exam to the post of Sub-Inspector.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the impugned rules were a conscious decision on the part of the employer-State to lay down more stringent eligibility criteria for appointment directly to the post of Sub-Inspector from the rank of Constable or Havildar, and that there was a presumption in favour of the constitutionality or validity of the subordinate legislation.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no merit in the challenge to the impugned rules.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners laid a challenge to the vires of Rule 7 (ka) and (kha) of the Jharkhand State Police Sub-Inspector Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Appointment Rules (Recruitment a Procedure), 2016 inter-alia grounds which have been usefully referred to in our order dated 14.11.2017. For better appreciation the order dated 14.11.2017 is quoted hereunder:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner urged two main grounds to question the vires of Rule 7 (ka) and 7(kha) of Jharkhand State Police Sub-Inspector Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Appointment Rules (Recruitment Procedure), 2016: (i) that the rule is in teeth of the existing provisions of Police Manual contained in Rule 726 (III) which lays down Disqualification for admission to a promotion list or retention thereon in case any incumbent has faced any major punishment in any rank within last three years (ii) the impugned Rule 7(k) renders a candidate ineligible in case he has faced any major punishment from the date of entry in service till appointment letter is issued or in case a Departmental Proceeding/Judicial Proceeding is pending or charge-sheet have been filed. 7(kha) on the other hand, prescribes bar of consideration in case there are adverse entries in the confidential roll of the police personnel in the last five years.
2. We usefully refer to Rule 726(III) which falls under Chapter-23 of Police Manual relating to Promotions and Allowances. Rule 721 provides that all promotions of Gazetted Officers including promotion from Non-Gazetted rank to Gazetted rank rests with Government but the Public Service Commission will also be consulted under Article 320 of the Indian Constitution. However, for promotion to the rank of Inspector (including Reserve Inspector) which is Gazetted, as per Appendix-2 of Bihar Service Code, the consultation with Bihar Public Service Commission is not required. Rule 726 of Police Manual is quoted hereunder:-
"726.(I) Next Below Rule - While making selection for any promotion course or for promotion list for officers on deputation to any department in any rank, their record in that department should also be considered (See Bihar Service Code, Rule 282). Deputationists, who are on promotion lists, are entitled in case their juniors are promoted in the parent cadre to get the benefit of the Next Below Rule.
(II) Conduct under enquiry - The case of an officer, whose conduct is under enquiry and who is otherwise considered in every respect fit for promotion shall be dealt with as follows:-
(a) If no case has been established till the date of promotion of the officer, this shall not be stopped. If, however, enquiries are in progress regarding misconduct of the officer, one post of appropriate seniority should be kept vacant till the final disposal of the enquiry - Memo No. CS/M3-1062/61-623, dated 9.2.1961 sent from Chief Secretary to all departments.
(b) Where a prima-facie case has been established on a preliminary investigation of the complaint and actionable material under the relevant punishment rules applicable to the officer concerned has been brought out and it is intended to take action against him under rules, he should not be promoted during the pendency of such enquiry whether the allegation relates to a period before the due date of promotion or afterwards.
(c) The above principle also applies for confirmation and crossing Efficiency Bar.
(III) Disqualification for admission to a promotion list or retention thereon - The infliction of any major punishment in any rank within the last 3 years may ordinarily be a bar to admission in any of the promotion list.
A gap of three years is necessary after the infliction of major punishment before an officer is retained or considered or reconsidered for any promotion list. For special reasons to be recorded, this disqualification may be relaxed by the competent officer who gives the promotion."
3. A conjoint reading of Rule 726 wit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.