APARESH KUMAR SINGH, B.B.MANGALMURTI
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners laid a challenge to the vires of Rule 7 (ka) and (kha) of the Jharkhand State Police Sub-Inspector Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Appointment Rules (Recruitment a Procedure), 2016 inter-alia grounds which have been usefully referred to in our order dated 14.11.2017. For better appreciation the order dated 14.11.2017 is quoted hereunder:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner urged two main grounds to question the vires of Rule 7 (ka) and 7(kha) of Jharkhand State Police Sub-Inspector Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Appointment Rules (Recruitment Procedure), 2016: (i) that the rule is in teeth of the existing provisions of Police Manual contained in Rule 726 (III) which lays down Disqualification for admission to a promotion list or retention thereon in case any incumbent has faced any major punishment in any rank within last three years (ii) the impugned Rule 7(k) renders a candidate ineligible in case he has faced any major punishment from the date of entry in service till appointment letter is issued or in case a Departmental Proceeding/Judicial Proceeding is pending or charge-sheet have
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.