JUDGMENT :

Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.

1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Senior Advocate submits that there are three sets of cases i.e.

a. Following cases relate to Vigilance P.S. Case No. 30/2016 corresponding to Vigilance Case No. 32/2016:

i. Cr.M.P. No. 2490 of 2016

ii. Cr. M.P. No. 1181 of 2016

iii. Cr.M.P. No. 1459 of 2018

iv. Cr. M.P. No. 1557 of 2016

v. Cr.M.P. No. 1797 of 2016

vi. W.P.(Cr) No. 191 of 2016

b. Following cases relate to Vigilance P.S. Case No. 31/2016 corresponding to Vigilance Case No. 33/2016:

i. Cr. M.P. No. 1182 of 2016

ii. Cr.M.P. No. 1562 of 2016

iii. Cr.M.P. No. 2489 of 2016

iv. Cr.M.P. No. 1711 of 2018

v. W.P.(Cr) No. 190 of 2016

And

c. Following cases relate to Vigilance P.S. Case No. 32/2016 corresponding to Vigilance Case No. 34/2016:

i. Cr.M.P. No. 3591 of 2017

ii. Cr.M.P. No. 3644 of 2017

iii. Cr.M.P. No. 3730 of 2017

iv. Cr.M.P. No. 3756 of 2017

v. Cr.M.P. No. 84 of 2017

vi. W.P.(Cr) No. 221 of 2016

3. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that all Cr.M.P. have been filed by the accused persons under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the 2nd FIR and similar questions are involved therefore