SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Jhk) 2101

APARESH KUMAR SINGH, B.B.MANGALMURTI
Mishra And Mishra Through Proprietor Manoj Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.B. Mangalmurti, J. :- Instant application has been filed seeking leave to prefer an appeal for setting aside the judgment dated 09.02.2009 passed in Cri. Appeal No. 22 of 1996 by Sessions Judge, Seraikela Kharsawan whereby the Court has allowed the appeal and thereby acquitted the opposite party Nos. 2 & 3 and thereafter set aside the judgment and sentence dated 11.05.2006 in C/1 Case No. 01 of 2003, Trial No. 549 of 2006 passed by Sri Anuj Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saraikela.

2. The short fact of the case is that the petitioner is consignee agent of one Idcol Ltd. and entered into business transaction with the opposite parties who run a construction business. The petitioner had supplied cement worth Rs. 4,41,600/- to opposite party during usual commercial transaction. The opposite party did not pay the bill, however a cheque for an amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- was drawn on 22.11.2002. On being presented, the cheque was returned unpaid with endorsement of '' stop payment'' from the bank on 23.11.2002. Thereafter, the petitioner raised a demand by way of notice but the opposite party even after receipt of the same did not make the payment which led to filing of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top