ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Jitendra Kumar Agarwala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. -Heard the parties.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction under section 439(2) Cr.P.C. with a prayer to pass orders for arrest of the opposite party nos. 2 & 3 and commit them to custody.
3. The allegation against the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 in brief is that they have created forged documents, suppressed financial data and have not incorporated the same in the balance sheet from the year 2010 to 2013. There is further allegation that the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 have misappropriated 35 acres of joint family property and also transferred the shares and management of Anup Malleables Ltd. to the co-accused persons and they have also given a false declaration before the Hon''ble Calcutta High Court.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 who are the accused persons of Complaint Case No. 2703 of 2014 have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail vide order dated 21.12.2015, passed in A.B.P. No. 1879 of 2015, by the Additional Sessions Judge -II, Dhanbad. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this petition ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.