JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.

2. The instant writ application has been preferred for the following relief:

“1. That, is the instant writ application the petitioner prays for issuance of appropriate writs/orders/directions in the nature of certiorari for quashing the notification contained in Memo No. 3497 (S) dated 21.06.2011 issued under the signature of the Respondent No. 2 whereby and whereunder in a most arbitrary and unsustainable manner without even providing the enquiry report and issuing second show cause to the Petitioner, he has been held guilty and the following punishment has been imposed upon the Petitioner:-

(i) Stoppage of two annual increments with cumulative effect.

(ii) Recovery of an amount of Rs. 2,90,240/- from the Petitioner.

The Petitioner further prays for issuance of appropriate writs/orders/directions for quashing of the letter contained in Memo No. 1535 (S) dated 05.03.2012 issued under the signature of the Respondent Deputy Secretary whereby and whereunder a deduction/ recovery of Rs. 29,024/- per month for ten months has been directed from the salary of the Petitioner.

The Petitioner further prays for issuanc