SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
Naveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
W.P. (C) No.3597 of 2020
Decided on : 02-03-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Lalit Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State :Mr. Mohan Dubey, Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 16 - Advertisement - Post of Assistant Mechanical/Civil Engineer - Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing setting aside remarks incomplete incorrect filling of relevant circles booklet series roll number in Paper which has been mentioned in the result of petitioners dated published on the website of Jharkhand Public Service Commission for Combined Assistant Engineer Preliminary Test Examination pursuant to Advertisement - Further prayer has been made for issuance direction upon respondents to call for the original copy of OMR answer sheets of petitioners in respect of the said examination of Paper- has also prayed for issuance of direction upon respondent authorities to evaluate the OMR answer sheets of petitioners in respect of said examination of Paper-and revise their results and further to declare them successful if they have got more marks than the last selected candidate – Held It is worth to mention that in a writ petition being State of Jharkhand & Ors - Filed against the rejection of candidature due to wrong shadowing of bubbles of OMR sheet in Combined Civil Service Mains Examination a Bench of this Court dismissed the said writ petition vide order dated with following observation petitioner in paragraph - Writ petition has himself admitted that darkened bubble under Centre Code wrongly - It is admitted at Bar that the entire system of evaluation of OMR sheet is fully and no manual interference is permitted - It is stated that in question booklet OMR sheet etc - Instruction was printed that OMR answer sheet will be processed electronically and OMR Scanning machine will reject OMR sheet in which Roll number Centre Code Subject Code Booklet Series and Booklet number are not properly and correctly shadowed - OMR sheet of the petitioner which was wrongly darkened at one place obviously was rejected by the computer and while so no direction can be issued to respondent- Jharkhand Public Service Commission to re - Assess or to accept the marks which was published on website wrongly - Petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

1. This case is taken up through video conferencing.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing/setting aside the remarks “incomplete/incorrect filling of the relevant circles of the booklet series/roll number in Paper-I/Paper-II” which has been mentioned in the result of the petitioners dated 14.08.2020, published on the website of Jharkhand Public Service Commission (in short ‘JPSC’) for Combined Assistant Engineer Preliminary Test (PT) Examination pursuant to the Advertisement No.05/2019. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the respondents to call for the original copy of OMR answer sheets of the petitioners in respect of the said examination of Paper-II. The petitioner has also prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondent authorities to evaluate the OMR answer sheets of the petitioners in respect of the said examination of Paper-II and revise their results and further to declare them successful, if they have got more marks than the last selected candidate.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent-Jharkhand Public Service Commission published an advertisement vide Advertisement No.05/2019 inviting online applications for recruitment of Combined Assistant Engineer. The petitioners applied for the post of Assistant Mechanical/Civil Engineer and appeared in the Combined Assistant Engineer PT examination which was held on 19.01.2020. It is further submitted that the result of the said examination was uploaded on the Website of the JPSC on 14.08.2020, however, the petitioners were not declared successful by putting remarks “Incomplete/Incorrect filling of the relevant circle of booklet series/roll number in Paper-I/Paper-II.” It is submitted that the petitioners have secured more marks than the last selected candidates in their respective categories and trades/branches in PT examination, as would be evident from the answer sheet published by the respondent-JPSC. It is further submitted that JPSC has violated the essential provisions i.e. Clause-2(vii) of the resolution, as contained in memo no.3143 dated 13.04.2016 issued by the Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, regarding supply of carbon copy of OMR answer sheets to the examinees after completion of PT Examination. The concerned respondent did not appreciate the aforesaid provision contained in the resolution dated 13.04.2016 and did not supply the carbon copy of OMR answer sheet to the petitioners, which is illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory. It is also submitted that due to the illegal action of the respondent-JPSC, the petitioners have been deprived of getting selected in the PT examination. It is a settled principle of law that meritorious candidates should not miss out an opportunity of earning their livelihood merely because of some inadvertent mistakes occurred due to examination stress. It is submitted that availing equal opportunity to complete in the selection process for public employment is a fundamental right enshrined under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. No impediment which is merely technical in nature should be allowed to play a substantive role resulting in denial of such right.

4. The learned counsel for the respondent-JPSC submits that all the petitioners committed mistake in filling the OMR sheets and on the said score alone, they are not entitled for any relief under the writ jurisdiction. OMR answer sheets are electronically processed and any mistake in filling the same leads to cancellation of the candidature of the examinee. It is further submitted that the aforesaid resolution dated 13.04.2016 was issued for the combined civil services competitive examination and the same is not applicable to the case of the petitioners. Moreover, the challenge to the selection process cannot be made by unsuccessful candidates.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top