ORDER :

Through Video Conferencing

Heard the parties

2. Petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the Award dated 30.09.2016, passed by learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro in Ref. Case No. 20 of 2010, whereby it has been held that the action of the Management in prematurely superannuating the respondent-workman is not justified and the workman is entitled for full back wages along with all consequential benefits w.e.f. 01.06.2006 to his actual date of superannuation i.e. 30.06.2010

3. It was the case of the workman before the learned Labour that he joined the services of Bokaro Steel Plant (for short “BSP”) as attendant on 08.06.1970 and in his personal data form he recorded his age as 20 years on the date of joining and as such, his date of birth is supposed to be 08.06.1950. It was the case of the workman that as per his aforesaid date of birth, his date of superannuation would be 31.05.2010. However, the petitioner-Management vide letter dated 24.12.2005 informed that workman that he is going to superannuate on 31.05.2006. It was the specific case of the workman that without issuance of any prior notice or giving opportunity of he