JUDGMENT :

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard Mrs. Vani Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard Ms. Niki Sinha, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State.

3. Heard Mr. S.K. Laik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2.

4. This criminal revision is directed against the judgment dated 24.05.2012 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner XVI, Ranchi in Criminal Appeal No. 78 of 2011 whereby the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner XVI has dismissed the Criminal Appeal which was filed against the judgment dated 27.04.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with C-815/2008 : T.R. No. 1369 of 2011 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, has convicted the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and he has been further ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- to the complainant under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C.

Argument on behalf of the petitioner

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned judgments are perverse, in as much as, there is no findin