SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, RATNAKER BHENGRA
Md. Aslam, son of Late Md. Hanif – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
On 11.03.2011, in the early morning Dr. Lalit Jain left home for a morning walk. When he did not come back home by 07:30 AM his family started making inquiries about him. At about 08:45 AM he called his family and told them that he would be back home soon. He called again at 09:40 AM and asked to arrange Twenty lakh rupees for paying ransom. He came back home the same evening and two days thereafter the accused persons who had come to Gandhi Maidan for collecting the ransom amount were nabbed by the police. They made disclosure before the police and confessed their involvement in the crime. After Dr. Lalit Jain had gone missing on 11.03.2011 his nephew lodged a report with the police and on the basis of the fardbeyan of Vivek Vinayak, Sadar P.S Case No.148 of 2011 was lodged on 12.03.2011 under section 364-A of the Indian Penal Code, against unknown. During the investigation statements of Masood Naiyar and Dr. Lalit Jain were recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and after the investigation a charge-sheet was laid against Md. Aslam, Manoj Kumar @ Babloo, Md. Noor and Md. Raju @ Afroz and they have faced the trial on the char
Ajmer Singh v. State of Punjab
Dwarkanath Varma v. King Emperor
Hate Singh Bhagat Singh v. State of MB
Kanta Prashad v. Delhi Administration
Malleshi v. State of Karnataka
Motilal Yadav v. State of Bihar
Namdeo v. State of Maharashtra
Ravinder Kumar v. State of Punjab
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
Sidhartha Vashisth alias Manu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
State of U. P v. Krishna Gopal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.