JUDGMENT :

(Through : Video Conferencing)

Heard, learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 16.06.2017 passed in Case No.14 of 2016 (JET) whereby the termination order dated 28.02.2014 passed by Principal of School as well as the appellant order passed by the President Managing Committee dated 16.01.2016 have been set aside by the learned Jharkhand Education Tribunal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant/respondent-School Management, Mr. Rahul Kuamr has assailed the impugned judgment on various counts but primarily on the locus of the respondent/petitioner, Smt. Jyoti Singh and has submitted that respondent, Smt. Jyoti Singh was a probationary appointee whose appointment was made on 13.08.2009 vide appointment letter DAV/2009-149 dated 13.08.2009 by the then District Education Officer, Ranchi-cum-receiver. The said appointment was not legal as receiver has to discharge day to day work and has no authority to appoint.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that service of the petitioner was not satisfactory to the management, as such, her service has never been confirmed and she remained in the status of probationer, a