JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

1. Heard through Video Conferencing.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court with multiple prayers; however, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his argument only on the point that this petitioner should get the difference of salary from 27.12.2003 to 29.07.2008 when he was working as in-charge Executive Engineer and further the difference of salary from 29.07.2008 till date since he has been made in-charge Superintending Engineer.

3. Mr. Ashim Kumar Sahani, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer on 19.01.1987. Thereafter, in the year 1995 he was promoted to the post of Assistant Engineer. Subsequently, pursuant to the notification as contained in Memo No. 10295 dated 27.12.2003; the petitioner has been given the charge of Executive Engineer from the date of notification; however, his substantive post was of Assistant Engineer.

Subsequently, pursuant to the notification dated 29.07.2008; the petitioner was given in-charge posting of Superintending Engineer. Here also the pay scale of the petitioner remains the same that of Assistant Engineer. Finally, the petitioner was promoted to the post