RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Hapna Manjhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The matter has been heard with the consent of learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. There is no complaint about any audio and visual quality.
I.A.No.3968 of 2021
Heard the parties.
This Interlocutory Application has been filed for expunging the name of appellant nos.1 and 2 namely, Patia Manjhian and Rupamani Manjhain, who are said to have been died on 23.09.2020 and 28.01.2021 respectively and for substituting the names of their heirs and legal representatives fully described in paragraph nos.2 and 3.
There is no opposition to the aforesaid application by filing any counter affidavit etc. or even by making any submission.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances mentioned in the Interlocutory Application, this application stands allowed.
Let the names of appellant nos.1 and 2 be expunged from the array of the appellants and their respective heirs and legal representatives fully described in paragraph nos.2 and 3 be substituted in their places.
It is noted that learned counsel for the appellants has claimed that he has filed the Vakalatnama on behalf of all the heirs and legal representatives of deceased-appellant nos.1 and 2.
It is further made clear th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.