JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mrs. Ritu Kumar alongwith Mr. D.K. Karmakar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in both the cases.

2. Heard Ms. Alka Kumari, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party No.2 in both the cases.

3. Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party-State.

4. Both criminal revision applications are directed against the Judgment dated 24.09.2012 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-III, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur in Criminal Appeal No. 89/2011 whereby and whereunder the learned appellate court has set aside the Judgment of acquittal dated 03.05.2011 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in C-1 Case No. 490 of 2007/T.R. No. 909 of 2011 and convicted the petitioners under Section 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one year and allowed the criminal appeal preferred by the Complainant.

Arguments of the petitioners

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the learned trial court had acquitted all the petitioners by a well-reasoned judgment, but by the impugned judgment, the learned appellate court