SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 95

N.L.UNTWALIA, R.S.SARKARIA
Bahal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
H.S.MARVAH, PREM MALHOTRA, R.L.Kohli, R.N.SACH

JUDGMENT

UNTWALIA, J. :— Bahal Singh, the sole respondent in this appeal, was tried by the Sessions Judge of Hisar for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of one Ram Sarup, brother of Manphool, P.W. 2. The Trial Judge held that the prosecution was not able to establish the occurrence in the manner alleged by any reliable evidence; at any rate, the case against the respondent was not free from doubt. Accordingly, he acquitted the respondent. On appeal by the State of Haryana the High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the respondents acquittal, convicted him under Section 302 of the Penal Code and imposed sentence of life imprisonment. This appeal has been preferred under Section 2 of the SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970.

2. The principles governing the scope of an appeal against acquittal and the High Courts power to interfere in it are well settled by several decision of this Court, to wit Khedu Mohton v. State of Bihar, (1970) 2 SCC 450 and Ram Jag v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1974 SC 606. In Khedu Mohtons case (supra) it has been pointed out by Hegde, J, in paragraph 3 at page 452.

"It is true that the powers of th
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top