ORDER :

Heard Mr. Rajendra Krishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner along with Mr. Pratyush Lala, Advocate.

2. Heard Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party - State.

3. The present criminal revision is directed against the judgment dated 30.03.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge- I - cum - Special Judge, C.B.I., Dhanbad in Criminal Appeal No.197 of 2008 whereby the learned appellate court has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner.

4. The judgment of conviction and sentence was passed by learned Railway Magistrate, Dhanbad on 01.07.2008 in R.P Case No.19 of 2004 whereby the petitioner was convicted along with other co-accused and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 3 years for offence under Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1966).

5. There were altogether 6 accused who faced the trial and out of them, 3 were acquitted and 3 were convicted.

Arguments on behalf of the Petitioner

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the impugned judgments has submitted that the impugned judgments are perverse and are accordingly fi