IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
Md. Azimuddin @ Md. Azzimuddin – Petitioner
Versus
State of Jharkhand and Another – Respondents
Cr.M.P. No. 886 of 2021
Decided On : 15-09-2021
Criminal Procedural Code, 1973 - Section 457, 362 – C Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 - Sections 207,177,179,182(A)(4) ,192(a),196,190(2) - Jharkhand Motor Vehicle Taxation Act - Sections 5,7,8,9,14,21,22,23,24,25,28(i), 29 – Court not to alter judgment - Court to pass appropriate orders with regard to such property - Petition has been filed for quashing order passed in Complaint Case by A.C.J.M. Ranchi, by which indemnity bond filed by petitioner for release of vehicle bearing Registration has been rejected with direction to send copy of that order to Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Jharkhand - Further prayer is made for direction to release vehicle in question – Held, court below itself has given direction to petitioner to pay a sum imposed against him by Taxing Officer/MVI or such amount whichever is assessed/modified by competent authority in due course, if any to Transport Authority and thereafter petitioner shall submit amount depositing receipt along with indemnity bond for release of bus - Amount of tax, as assessed by the District Transport Officer, was deposited by petitioner and pursuant thereto No Objection Certificate was issued in favour of petitioner - There is no doubt that the impugned order is of several pages, but the court below has not considered Section 362 Cr.P.C - Court below has got no jurisdiction to review its own order - Neither State has denied this fact in counter affidavit nor the State has preferred any revision or appeal under the said Act - Vehicle in question will be destroyed if it is kept open for a long time - Petition allowed.
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Rajendra Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.A.S. Pati assisted by Mr. Rohan Kashyap, learned counsel for the opposite party-State.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been taken through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard on merit.
3. This petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 26.02.2021 passed in Complaint Case No. 6858/2020 by the learned A.C.J.M. Ranchi, by which the indemnity bond filed by the petitioner for release of the vehicle bearing Registration No. JH-02R-9711 has been rejected with direction to send the copy of that order to the Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. The further prayer is made for direction to release the vehicle in question.
4. The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Ranchi has filed a prosecution report of vehicle bearing Registration No. JH-02R-9711 (Bus) which was seized on 09.10.2020 and said prosecution report has been filed in which the allegation has been levelled under Sections 207/177/179/182(A)(4) of the Motor Vehicle Act and under Sections 5/7/8/9/14/21/22/23/24/25/28(i)/29 of the Motor Vehicle Taxation Act and request has been made that the prosecution be started against the aforesaid provisions of Motor Vehicle Act and Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, since the motor vehicle was plying with dangerous/unsafe and invalid alteration in the bus body and the vehicle which found to be used without payment of proper Jharkhand State Road Tax.
5. On 22.10.2020, the learned A.C.J.M. Ranchi has taken cognizance of the offence under Sections 207/177/179/192(a)/182(A)(4)/196/190(2) of the CMV Act, 1988 and under Sections 5/7/8/9/14/21/22/23/24/25/28(i)/29 of the Jharkhand Motor Vehicle Taxation Act and, accordingly, summons were issued against the petitioner. The petitioner filed Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 6484/2020 arising out of Complaint Case No. 6858/2020 under Section 207 of the Motor Vehicle Act read with Section 457 Cr.P.C. for release of the said seized vehicle and on 17.11.2020, the direction was issued to release the vehicle on following conditions:
6. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Transport Commissioner, Jharkhand against imposition of tax and the Transport Commissioner, Jharkhand vide order dated 24.12.2020 directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the District Transport Officer, Ranchi, contained in Annexure-17 of the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner. The District Transport Officer, Ranchi vide letter dated 05.02.202
The central legal point established is the interpretation and application of Rule 6 of the Jharkhand Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Rules, 2019, regarding the release of seized vehicles involved in a....
Violation of principles of natural justice and lack of appointment of taxing officers influenced the court's decision to release the vehicle without forcing payment of the tax amount.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Rule 6(1) of the Jharkhand Motor Accident Claim Tribunal Rule, 2019, which allows for the release of a vehicle if the owner f....
Rule 6 of the Jharkhand Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Rules, 2019 allows for the release of a vehicle involved in an accident upon furnishing sufficient security, even if the vehicle is not insured.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.